Organized retail crime (ORC) has been in the crosshairs of shrink reduction efforts for a long time now. But for many retailers, battling ORC has seemed less like a victory story and more like an arms raceāfor every stride made, the opposition adapts. ORC is a part of the retail marketplace, and it operates under the same basic principles as retailers. There is an opportunity to make a profit by supplying a demand, so various ORC players take it upon themselves to become the suppliers. But where exactly is that demand?
It turns out that a significant portion of the demand that ORC players are supplying comes from retailers themselves. Retailers are fueling the ORC system by buying product that may well have already been on their own store shelves, stolen, and completed a round-a-bout loop through the ORC underworld.
Tony Sheppard, LPC, national manager of the Organized Retail Crime Unit at CVS Health, has taken it upon himself to combat this self-defeating loop. āCompanies are very often unintentionally purchasing stolen product,ā he said. āAnd if they are, theyāre the ones creating the demand to steal that product.ā
He explained, āA retailer puts product on the shelf. A booster steals that product and sells it to a fence. That fence can turn around and sell the product right back to the consumer. That could be at a flea market, online, in mom-and-pop stores, and other places. But when it comes to health-and-beauty-aid (HBA) products and over-the-counter drugs (OTC), typically this stolen product goes from a mid-level fence to a wholesaler. And then the wholesaler packages it in bulk and turns around and resells it to retailers. Sometimes these are national retailers. Usually they are regional chains, but thatās not to say that large companies arenāt doing it as well. Lots of retailers donāt realize that theyāre buying stolen or potentially counterfeit product.ā
The key to this convoluted scheme, the groups who ālaunderā stolen product back into legitimacy, are diverters. Diverters go by many namesāwholesalers, salvage companies, alternate source suppliersābut they are the end medium through which retailers are buying stolen product and so fueling the demand that powers organized retail crime.
The Booster-Fence Ecosystem
The easiest way to understand exactly what diverters are and how they operate is to take a close look at the ORC ecosystem that theyāre a part of. Boostersāthe people who steal products intending to resell themāand fencesāthe buyers of stolen goodsāvary enormously when it comes to the scale of their operations. As these actors deal with increasing volumes of stolen goods, the geographic area in which they operate tends to increase, as does the sophistication of their techniques. So for ease of discussion, they can be categorized into a hierarchy of three tiers.
The level 1 booster is someone who steals relatively small amounts, works alone, and operates locally. If they live in Phoenix, they might never leave Phoenix to steal. They might steal things from their neighborhood CVS and walk right across the street to Mom and Popās Market to sell them. Itās not uncommon for drug addicts to fall into this category, stealing just enough for them to get by for the day. āTo me, anyone who steals something to resell I would classify as a booster,ā said Sheppard. āIf they come in and steal five packs of toothpaste and sell them across the street, Iād still consider that ORC, because theyāre part of the ORC web.ā
When a booster begins to travel to nearby cities to steal, when they increase their sophistication and volume, often teaming up with a partner or a group, they can be considered level 2 boostersāregional players. In comparison, the level 3 booster is a team of coordinated criminals who operate nationally and may sell their product directly to diverters.
The level 1 fence is directly reselling product to consumers. They often appear to be legitimate businessesāthey might be a local corner market, a swap shop, or a booth at a flea market. They sometimes recruit and train boosters, and they may buy product from level 1, 2, or 3 boosters. While most of the product a level 1 fence buys goes straight back to the consumer, they may move product daily or weekly to a level 2 fence. āIf I bring ten boxes of Crest Whitestrips to him, he may not put that directly on the shelf,ā explained Sheppard. āHe may hold it and sell it to a higher level fence.ā
The primary function of the level 2 fence is to repackage stolen product and sell it to the level 3 fenceāthe diverter. They donāt buy from the small-timers. They buy from level 2 and 3 boosters, or in some cases from level 1 fences. āFor example, in one case we had a fence that drove around a van every day collecting product that seventeen level 1 fences had bought that day,ā said Sheppard. āThen they repackage it all, and it goes straight to the wholesaler.ā
Level 2 fences clean the product, removing stickers, security devices, or other markings that could identify which retailer the product had been stolen from. Then they repackage the product for distribution. They typically operate out of a residential house, a warehouse, or a storage unit. Storage units are appealing because they can be rented cheaply and easily, making it simple to evade detection by switching locations frequently. Some may rent several storage units and spread their product between them to minimize their losses if they do happen to be raided by law enforcement. The level 2 fence is the middleman between boosters and wholesalers. They typically donāt have a storefront, and though they may sell some of their product online, the bulk is sold to diverters.
The level 3 fences (the diverters) complete the circle, selling stolen product back to retailers. They operate as a legitimate wholesaler or distributor, mixing legitimate product with stolen product and selling it back into the retail commerce stream. In many cases, they donāt know that the product theyāre buying was stolen, though they probably begin to suspect so.
āA lot of these companies donāt realize that theyāre inadvertently buying stolen or counterfeit product,ā said Sheppard. āThey see a good price, and itās hard to fathom that someone stole four pallets of Mucinex, so they buy it. I think that the majority probably are suspicious, but they just donāt think about it that much. Over the course of time, maybe they notice irregularities, like a label that hasnāt been removed, or they get suspicious based on the prices. I think they probably get an idea that somethingās wrong eventually, but they just look the other way.ā
Why Do Diverters Exist?
So why do diverters exist in the first place? Why does the retail marketplace tolerate an avenue for stolen merchandise to be resold to them? āPeople may ask, āHow could somebody possibly buy from these places? They must know these goods are stolen.ā But there are other reasons diverters are able to sell goods more cheaply than manufacturers,ā said Sheppard.
Diverters exist because smaller retailersālocal and regional chainsārely on them as suppliers. If youāre a local retail chain with ten stores, you canāt buy directly from the manufacturer because you canāt meet their minimum order requirements. So the diverter will buy from the manufacturer and then resell to you and a dozen similarly sized companies.
But diverters acquire legitimate products from other places tooāanywhere they can get products cheaply enough to resell at a profit. They buy closeout goods. If a manufacturer is set to release a new seasonās line of razor blades, they arenāt going to just throw away last seasonās razors. Instead, they sell them to a diverter. Similarly, when a large national retailer buys product embedded inside a display, the retailers sells the inevitable excess to a diverter.
Retail overbuy is another source of legitimate product. Massive international retail companies get the absolute lowest prices from manufacturers because of the unrivaled scale of their purchase volumes. Because of their volume discount, they know that they can sell to diverters at a profit, so they may buy an extra million pieces beyond what is needed for their own purposes because reselling to the diverter can easily make small margin at very little risk or effort. This allows other retail chains to get legitimate product from a diverter more cheaply than from the manufacturer.
And thatās what it comes down toābuyers are incentivized to find the lowest prices for the products they decide to stock. For certain products, diverters will have the lowest prices. So retailers will continue to buy from them. āI think the bulk of retailers are clueless about diverters,ā said Sheppard. āThe buyers donāt work in LP, and I donāt think the thought that the product could be stolen crosses their minds. All retailers buy from diverters, though they donāt like to advertise the fact. Sometimes itās for no other reason than the manufacturers being out of stock of a product.ā
Reboxing and Counterfeit Goods
Diverters buy the cheapest goods they can find. With so many different avenues for legitimate goods to be resold, is it any wonder that stolen product gets mixed in? Even when diverters rebox product, theyāre not trying to claim that itās from the original manufacturer. Some companies, like CVS, wonāt accept product unless itās in a manufacturer spec caseāa precaution against, among other things, counterfeitingāthough most retailers donāt have that requirement. So how do retailers know that theyāre not buying counterfeit goods when buying from a diverter?
Counterfeit goods do occasionally enter the US retail stream. But diverters want nothing to do with anything counterfeit. If retail buyers learn that they received counterfeit goods from a diverter, theyāll spread the word, and that diverter will be blacklisted.
āIām only aware of a few instances of counterfeit. It only makes sense for specific items and price points,ā said Sheppard. āThe fact is, when you buy something from somewhere other than the manufacturer, youāre taking that risk. Youāre not certain of where that product comes from. But the diverter is never going to knowingly buy counterfeit product. Theyāll get cut off completely.ā If counterfeit goods do show up, itāll be the level 2 fence bringing them in from overseas. Some diverters have substantial programs in place to inspect incoming goods, specifically looking to make sure theyāre not buying counterfeit.
And, of course, manufacturers are also very concerned with keeping counterfeit products off retail shelves. āMost manufacturers are very helpful with these cases,ā said Sheppard. āTheyāre very concerned with brand integrity. During one of our investigations, we sold a fence tens of thousands of dollars of product, and 95 percent of that product was donated from the manufacturer. They have a vested interest in protecting their brand.ā
Online Marketplaces and Meeting Places
Counterfeit goods can be sold online, as can product stolen by ORC actors. While some amount of stolen product is posted for online sale by fences of all levels of sophistication, the bulk of it ends up back in the retail supply chain. āIf that sheer amount of product is being stolen, where could it possibly be resold? The bulk of HBA and OTC online is stolen product. Youāll sell some there. But even though online is popular, youāre not going to compete with Walmart. So to sell that much Prevagen, Prilosec, Claritin, or Zyrtec, youāll have to sell it to retail,ā explained Sheppard.
The more important aspect of fences having an online presence is, just like with so many other groups, networking. Occasionally, people who have experience operating with ORC and the grey economy will train level 2 fences and will tell them who the diverters are. But usually diverters find fences online. āIf a booster comes in and steals twenty boxes of Prilosec from ten stores, people think that ends up all being sold online,ā said Sheppard. āBut without question the bulk is sold offline. I do think some investigators spend inordinate amounts of time going after online fences who, from a volume standpoint, arenāt massive pieces. No, the online world is more of a meeting place between the booster and the fence or between the level 2 and level 3 fence. If I am getting started as a fence and list product on eBay, these diverters will buy that product from me. Then theyāll reach out to me privately and say, āHey, any time you have forty-two-count Prilosec, Iāll buy as much of it as you have, no questions asked.ā Well, then I want more of that product, since itās a guaranteed sale.ā
What to Do?
To whatever extent retailers are bringing in stolen product from diverters at the loading dock, they are fueling external theft from their shelves in the front of the store. This cycling of product is an ORC engine that can be stoppedāor slowedāat either end. But while most retailers have worked extensively to battle external theft, how much effort has been put toward battling the symmetric problem of unknowingly buying stolen products?
According to Sheppard, āI feel thatās the biggest opportunityāthe point between the wholesaler and the retailer. I think that if we the retailers just scrutinize who weāre buying product from, then thatāll go a long way toward eliminating these issues. Iām not saying we shouldnāt buy from diverters, because everybody does, though some will tell you they donāt. Iām just saying we should take basic steps to make sure the people weāre doing business with are legit. There are companies who are literally buying 20 or 30 million dollars of product from people who theyāve met one time, and they donāt even know where their warehouse is.ā
One issue is that itās a tough topic to discuss. Naturally, retailers arenāt thrilled with the idea of sharing all the information of their suppliers with customers or competitors. If a customer goes to buy an OTC drug from the store, that customer assumes that theyāre buying into an unbroken chain of custodyāfrom the manufacturer to the store to their shopping basket. āRetailers just donāt like to talk about this,ā said Sheppard. āThey want you to continue to assume that everything you buy comes in pristine, straight from the manufacturer. One of the arguments thatās made against buying stuff online is you donāt know who youāre buying fromāit could be counterfeit, it could be stolenābut thatās true of retailers too. Itās one of those topics thatās taboo. They donāt want to advertise it to the average consumer.ā
And thatās when the retailer is aware of the issue. Remarkably, many retailers donāt even know that they are opening themselves up to this kind of exposure. Or if they do, that knowledge might be limited to certain individuals or teams within the organization. āA lot of companies donāt even know theyāre buying from diverters,ā said Sheppard. āWhen it comes to small chains, they donāt have much of a choice in who theyāre buying from, and they donāt have a clue that theyāre buying this stolen product. At most retail companies, not even LP is aware this is happening, or if they are, they donāt have a seat at the table. Some retailers have small dedicated teams that pursue diversion losses aggressively. But others donāt think that itās as big of an issue as we here at CVS think it is. They focus on internal theft. External theft is seen as a cost of doing business.ā
So what can a retailer do to ensure theyāre not contributing to the demand for stolen products? āThere are a number of steps they can take, like weāve done here at CVS. I think the first step is they should scrutinize who theyāre buying from,ā Sheppard advised. āThey should know where the wholesalerās warehouses are, and they should inspect those warehouses. Is there a vetting process? Do they run background checks on the owners? Do they look to see if the company has ever been sued before? Do they check to make sure there arenāt seven different lots of Prilosec in the same box?
āFinally, I think the communication piece is a big part of the solution. Thatās why CVS lets me talk about this. Any company reducing demand will benefit everyone. If we get more companies to scrutinize their diverters, itās going to benefit CVS because itās going to reduce theft. If people were more aware and more open about whatās happening and get together and look at this stuff together, without question thereād be a drop in this level of activity. When any one large retailer takes a look at their suppliers and finds an issue with one and stops buying from them, that translates into an instant reduction in demand for items targeted by ORC. Itās a simple chain of cause and effectāstop buying, less stealing.ā
Like many issues in retail loss prevention, the issue of injecting demand that ORC feeds off of is an industry issue as well as an individual company issue, and one that can only be truly addressed industry-wide. A company doesnāt know if diverted goods originated on their shelves or their competitorās. And to some degree, it doesnāt matter since in either case itās incentivizing ORC actors to continue to operate. Closer collaboration with buyers within the company, as well as fellow LP professionals across the industry, can help to slow this ORC engine and reduce loss for everyone.
SIDEBAR
The cover story of LP Magazineās inaugural issue fifteen years ago was titled āOrganized Retail TheftāFrom Prison Training Grounds to a Store Near You.ā In that article, King Rogers outlined the scope and mechanics of ORCāreferred to at that time as ORTācalling for more intensive study, greater awareness, and better legislation to combat ORC.
And in that decade and a half, a lot has changed. LP Magazine has changed. The LP industry has changed. Retail has changed. Laws have changed, consumers have changed, and criminals have changed. But the battle between retailers and ORC groups rages on. While the basic elements of ORC remain the same, its methods have evolved considerably in response to the technological, methodological, and educational deterrents implemented by retailers.
Rogers got his wishes. We have better information about ORCāuniversities, industry groups, law enforcement, and internal organizations have all studied the problem extensively. We have better awareness. ORC is one of the most talked about and targeted avenues of loss. And we have better legislation. Federal and state laws have been implemented that address ORC directly, as well as provide a legal framework for associated issues. There is more work to be done on these fronts, but progress has been made.
But it hasnāt been enough. ORC hasnāt gone away, and some might argue that, in fact, it has increased. If anything, it is now at least a known quantity. Maybe ORC is a permanent fixture in the retail arena. Or maybe the ever-accelerating technological revolution will one day render ORC a solved problem. In any case, successfully fighting ORC will depend on tackling both ends of the supply chaināboosters taking product out of the store as well as diverters shipping product in to the store. This conclusion is as true today as it was fifteen years ago, when Rogers ended his article with this: āThere is an old saying that you canāt kill a snake unless you cut off its head. In the case of organized retail theft, until the illicit wholesalers are dismantled, the problem will continue.ā