Get Our Email Newsletter

LPM Survey: Should Retailers Restrict the Sale of Firearms?

Gun control issues have been an ongoing topic, and recently back in the spotlight as a primary focus of attention following the recent tragedy in Parkland, FL. This has also reignited furor over the terrifying incident in Las Vegas during a music festival last October and the dozens of other incidents involving gun violence in recent years.

Debates have raged as the public seeks action. While 97 percent of the public agrees that further gun control in some form needs to be implemented, legislators remain deadlocked on the best ways to address this polarizing issue.

Should we raise the age limits on the purchases of certain firearms? Should certain firearms be banned altogether? Should background checks and waiting periods be mandatory for every gun sale? Should bump stocks and high-capacity ammunition magazines be banned? Should teachers carry guns?

LP Solutions

Tech-Driven Defense: Solutions and Strategies to Help Retailers Stay Ahead of Shrink

In this Sensormatic and LPF webinar, a team of retail professionals discussed their ideas and proactive strategies to tackle hot topic issues such as internal shrink, ORC and return fraud; all while keeping consumer expectations and safety in mind.


While every side holds a passionate opinion regarding how these questions should be answered, we should all be able to agree that responsible decisions and responsible action should be our top priority. It’s simply not acceptable that men, women, and children remain victims as we sift through the legal battles and special interests that too often slow our decisions to a crawl.

In response, several retailers have made their own decisions regarding the firearms debate. Some have pulled firearms altogether. Several have pulled certain firearms from their shelves, and no longer carry these weapons in their stores. Several have banned high-capacity magazines and other accessories intended to maximize bodily harm. Others have raised age restrictions and will no longer sell some or all firearms to those under 21 years of age.

- Digital Partner -

These are tough decisions that carry consequences from both a brand and financial perspective. While not intended to step on 2nd Amendment rights or to restrict hunters, sportsmen, or those seeking personal protection, these retailers have made a business decision to restrict purchases or simply no longer sell these items rather than waiting for legislators to make up their minds on what should be done.

What do you think? Should these decisions be condemned or applauded? In this week’s LPM Survey, we ask:


- Digital Partner -


We look forward to your insights and opinions! Please feel free to candidly share your thoughts. All responses to the survey will remain anonymous.

Look for the results of the survey to appear in next Monday’s LPM Insider.


Loss Prevention Magazine updates delivered to your inbox

Get the free daily newsletter read by thousands of loss prevention professionals, security, and retail management from the store level to the c-suite.

What's New

Digital Partners

Become a Digital Partner

Violence in the Workplace

Download this 34-page special report from Loss Prevention Magazine about types and frequency of violent incidents, impacts on employees and customers, effectiveness of tools and training, and much more.


View All | Sponsor a Webinar


View All | Submit a Whitepaper

LP Solutions

View All | Submit Your Content

Download our 34-page special report:  Violence in the Retail Workplace

Loss Prevention Media Logo

Stay up-to-date with our free email newsletter

The trusted newsletter for loss prevention professionals, security and retail management. Get the latest news, best practices, technology updates, management tips, career opportunities and more.

No, thank you.

View our privacy policy.